0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1440 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 180 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 08:03:08 EDT 2024 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.20/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FaV0oQcg1W/E---3.1_7719.p 1.30/0.66 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 1.30/0.66 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHSA. 1.30/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.30/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 900s (5) cores 1.30/0.66 # Starting new_ho_11 with 180s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # Starting sh2l with 180s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # Starting new_bool_6 with 180s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # sh2l with pid 7799 completed with status 0 1.30/0.66 # Result found by sh2l 1.30/0.66 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHSA. 1.30/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.30/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 900s (5) cores 1.30/0.66 # Starting new_ho_11 with 180s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # Starting sh2l with 180s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 1.30/0.66 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLF32-MHSFFSBC 1.30/0.66 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 1.30/0.66 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # new_ho_10 with pid 7807 completed with status 0 1.30/0.66 # Result found by new_ho_10 1.30/0.66 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHSA. 1.30/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.30/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 900s (5) cores 1.30/0.66 # Starting new_ho_11 with 180s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # Starting sh2l with 180s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 1.30/0.66 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLF32-MHSFFSBC 1.30/0.66 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 1.30/0.66 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 1.30/0.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s 1.30/0.66 # Presaturation interreduction done 1.30/0.66 1.30/0.66 # Proof found! 1.30/0.66 # SZS status Theorem 1.30/0.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_sort1, type, nat: $tType). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_sort2, type, a: $tType). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_sort3, type, list_a: $tType). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_22, type, minus_minus_nat: nat > nat > nat). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_31, type, listIn1312259492pend_a: list_a > (nat > a) > nat > a). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_33, type, listIn1417627087drop_a: nat > (nat > a) > nat > a). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_39, type, drop_a: nat > list_a > list_a). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_45, type, size_size_list_a: list_a > nat). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_46, type, ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_47, type, ord_less_eq_nat: nat > nat > $o). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_48, type, f: nat > a). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_49, type, n: nat). 1.30/0.66 thf(decl_50, type, xs: list_a). 1.30/0.66 thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((~((ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)))=>((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)) @ f)))&(((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ n @ xs) @ f))<=(ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FaV0oQcg1W/E---3.1_7719.p', conj_0)). 1.30/0.66 thf(fact_209_verit__comp__simplify1_I3_J, axiom, ![X40:nat, X41:nat]:((~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X40 @ X41))<=>(ord_less_nat @ X41 @ X40))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FaV0oQcg1W/E---3.1_7719.p', fact_209_verit__comp__simplify1_I3_J)). 1.30/0.66 thf(fact_35_i__append__i__drop__eq2, axiom, ![X20:list_a, X8:nat, X74:nat > a]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ (size_size_list_a @ X20) @ X8)=>((listIn1417627087drop_a @ X8 @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ X20 @ X74))=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ X8 @ (size_size_list_a @ X20)) @ X74)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FaV0oQcg1W/E---3.1_7719.p', fact_35_i__append__i__drop__eq2)). 1.30/0.66 thf(fact_203_less__le, axiom, ((ord_less_nat)=(^[X45:nat, X46:nat]:((((X45)!=(X46))&(ord_less_eq_nat @ X45 @ X46))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FaV0oQcg1W/E---3.1_7719.p', fact_203_less__le)). 1.30/0.66 thf(fact_33_i__append__i__drop__eq1, axiom, ![X8:nat, X20:list_a, X123:nat > a]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X8 @ (size_size_list_a @ X20))=>((listIn1417627087drop_a @ X8 @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ X20 @ X123))=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ X8 @ X20) @ X123)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FaV0oQcg1W/E---3.1_7719.p', fact_33_i__append__i__drop__eq1)). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(((~(ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs))=>((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)) @ f)))&((ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs))=>((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ n @ xs) @ f))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X40:nat, X41:nat]:((~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X40 @ X41)<=>(ord_less_nat @ X41 @ X40))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_209_verit__comp__simplify1_I3_J])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((((ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs))|~(ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)))&(((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))!=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ n @ xs) @ f))|~(ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs))))&(((ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs))|((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))!=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)) @ f)))&(((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))!=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ n @ xs) @ f))|((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))!=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)) @ f))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1048:list_a, X1049:nat, X1050:nat > a]:((~(ord_less_eq_nat @ (size_size_list_a @ X1048) @ X1049)|((listIn1417627087drop_a @ X1049 @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ X1048 @ X1050))=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1049 @ (size_size_list_a @ X1048)) @ X1050)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_35_i__append__i__drop__eq2])])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1168:nat, X1169:nat]:((((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1168 @ X1169)|(ord_less_nat @ X1169 @ X1168))&(~(ord_less_nat @ X1169 @ X1168)|~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1168 @ X1169)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X768:nat, X769:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X768 @ X769)<=>(((X768)!=(X769))&(ord_less_eq_nat @ X768 @ X769)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_203_less__le])])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs))|((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))!=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)) @ f))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X11:list_a, X9:nat > a, X1:nat]:((((listIn1417627087drop_a @ X1 @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ X11 @ X9))=(listIn1417627087drop_a @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1 @ (size_size_list_a @ X11)) @ X9))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ (size_size_list_a @ X11) @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X2:nat, X1:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X2)|(ord_less_nat @ X2 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X1172:nat, X1173:nat]:((((((X1172)!=(X1173))|~(ord_less_nat @ X1172 @ X1173))&((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1172 @ X1173)|~(ord_less_nat @ X1172 @ X1173)))&(((X1172)=(X1173))|~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1172 @ X1173)|(ord_less_nat @ X1172 @ X1173)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))!=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ n @ xs) @ f))|~((ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1051:nat, X1052:list_a, X1053:nat > a]:((~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1051 @ (size_size_list_a @ X1052))|((listIn1417627087drop_a @ X1051 @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ X1052 @ X1053))=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ X1051 @ X1052) @ X1053)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_33_i__append__i__drop__eq1])])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X2)|~((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f))!=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ n @ xs) @ f)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X1:nat, X9:nat > a, X11:list_a]:((((listIn1417627087drop_a @ X1 @ (listIn1312259492pend_a @ X11 @ X9))=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ (drop_a @ X1 @ X11) @ X9))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ (size_size_list_a @ X11))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (ord_less_eq_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_16])). 1.30/0.66 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), c_0_21])]), ['proof']). 1.30/0.66 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 1.30/0.66 # Parsed axioms : 286 1.30/0.66 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 75 1.30/0.66 # Initial clauses : 548 1.30/0.66 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 23 1.30/0.66 # Initial clauses in saturation : 525 1.30/0.66 # Processed clauses : 744 1.30/0.66 # ...of these trivial : 8 1.30/0.66 # ...subsumed : 203 1.30/0.66 # ...remaining for further processing : 532 1.30/0.66 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 75 1.30/0.66 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 1.30/0.66 # Backward-subsumed : 2 1.30/0.66 # Backward-rewritten : 4 1.30/0.66 # Generated clauses : 1086 1.30/0.66 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 911 1.30/0.66 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 1.30/0.66 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3 1.30/0.66 # Paramodulations : 976 1.30/0.66 # Factorizations : 4 1.30/0.66 # NegExts : 12 1.30/0.66 # Equation resolutions : 93 1.30/0.66 # Disequality decompositions : 0 1.30/0.66 # Total rewrite steps : 251 1.30/0.66 # ...of those cached : 171 1.30/0.66 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 1.30/0.66 # Propositional check models : 0 1.30/0.66 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 1.30/0.66 # Propositional clauses : 0 1.30/0.66 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 1.30/0.66 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 1.30/0.66 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 1.30/0.66 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 1.30/0.66 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 1.30/0.66 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 1.30/0.66 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 1.30/0.66 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 1.30/0.66 # Current number of processed clauses : 143 1.30/0.66 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28 1.30/0.66 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2 1.30/0.66 # Negative unit clauses : 24 1.30/0.66 # Non-unit-clauses : 89 1.30/0.66 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1020 1.30/0.66 # ...number of literals in the above : 3223 1.30/0.66 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 1.30/0.66 # Current number of archived clauses : 334 1.30/0.66 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28159 1.30/0.66 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6540 1.30/0.66 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 173 1.30/0.66 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 514 1.30/0.66 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 1.30/0.66 # BW rewrite match attempts : 40 1.30/0.66 # BW rewrite match successes : 7 1.30/0.66 # Condensation attempts : 744 1.30/0.66 # Condensation successes : 18 1.30/0.66 # Termbank termtop insertions : 85988 1.30/0.66 # Search garbage collected termcells : 10554 1.30/0.66 1.30/0.66 # ------------------------------------------------- 1.30/0.66 # User time : 0.124 s 1.30/0.66 # System time : 0.007 s 1.30/0.66 # Total time : 0.131 s 1.30/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 4056 pages 1.30/0.66 1.30/0.66 # ------------------------------------------------- 1.30/0.66 # User time : 0.132 s 1.30/0.66 # System time : 0.011 s 1.30/0.66 # Total time : 0.143 s 1.30/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 2180 pages 1.30/0.66 % E---3.1 exiting 1.30/0.66 % E exiting 1.30/0.66 EOF